Common animals such as dogs, cats, horses, pigs, and cows are kept as pets and are adaptive to humans because they are domesticated. But most of their relatives like foxes, tigers, and zebras remain stubbornly wild and dangerous to humans. Some exotic pet enthusiasts adopt wild animals and take care of them when they are infants so they will adjust to the human environment, only to experience injuries from their hits, or worse, having their babies or young children eaten alive.
There pops the question: Is it really possible to tame a wild animal?
Before we continue, let us differentiate taming with domestication. Taming is a human-directed act of taking a wild animal and giving it a lot of careful nurturing to make them tolerant of human presence. The human becomes its parental figure.
Let’s use tigers as an illustration. You can tame one better if you raise it from birth. Look at the stereotypical animal circus with tigers jumping through hoops of fire. Tigers can follow the instructions of a human and not attack them because they are trained to be tamed. Now, consider it as a pet – imagine a tiger as tame as a domestic cat. Even the most adorable pet tabby cat can pounce around corners, bat playfully, climb up and scratch on things. Occasionally, cats can get grumpy and let out a swipe. For them, it’s just fine. But when its bigger and wilder relative, the tiger, lets out even just a playful swipe or pounce, it can mean losing half a face or harsh body injuries for a human.
However, domestication takes more effort because you must work on generations of a wild animal species and selectively breed them to have an inherited predisposition towards human beings. Domestication is a permanent genetic modification wherein behaviors of wild animals evolve to reduce undesirable traits and emphasize desirable ones. It is usually done to fill a useful niche in human society. If a domestic animal fits a specific human need already, it is more convenient and practical to adapt it rather than to domesticate a new one to fill that need.
It is possible to domesticate a tiger after raising multiple generations, but it is difficult. For tigers to be truly domesticated, there would be a lot of people who would risk their lives because even a tamed tiger can act unpredictably. Plus, domesticating a tiger would be expensive work because they eat a lot of meat. If you run out of meat to feed them, its hunger and natural instincts can trigger them to look at you (or any other human) as a sumptuous dinner, without recognizing that you are their master. In short, domesticating wild animals is dangerous.
Not all tame animals are automatically domestic. Pet crows, alligators and cheetahs can be tame, yet their breeding was not controlled by humans, thus making them undomesticated. Meanwhile, not all domestic animals need to be tame like farm chickens and Spanish fighting bulls.
A study suggests that many species that haven’t been domesticated could be – humans just don’t try. In the 1950s, a Russian scientist named Dmitri Belyaev did experiments to domesticate foxes. Usually, wild foxes are solitary, independent and shy. Belyaev repeatedly selected only the foxes that were most comfortable around humans and kept them for further breeding with the goal of re-creating the evolution of wolves into dogs, a process that began more than 15,000 years ago.
Miraculously, Belyaev was able to compress thousands of years of domestication into only a few years. By the mid-1960s, the experiment worked. He was producing foxes that are not just unafraid of humans but were actively seeking to bond with them. Besides that, he was also able to see first-hand that domestication also brings changes to animals’ outer characteristics, a fact documented by Darwin in his work The Variation of Animals and Plants Under Domestication. The domesticated foxes tend to be smaller, with curlier tails and floppier ears than their wild ancestors. Such traits tend to make animals appear more pet-like for humans.
On the flip side, the consequences of taking wild animals out of their natural habitat and forcing them to live in a cage as pets are equally devastating. People need to understand that just because humans can hand-rear lion cubs does not mean they can invoke change in their sensitive adrenal glands that drive them to hunt. Thousands of years ago, many wild animals were domesticated out of necessity, but taming and domesticating wild animals this time can be nothing more than self-gratification. Nowadays, a lot of wild species are becoming endangered and extinct, and people must focus on their conservation and survival, not on taking them as captives in an environment that would be hard for them to adapt. It would be better for us and for the wild animals if we would adopt already domesticated animals as pets. Wild animals should be able to live freely in the wild.
- What happened to Kamala Harris 2
- What is the state animal of Eritrea
- What are some money market securities
- Has Putin helped Russia
- Is Mexican food popular in Greece
- Why do people like candy
- Which exotic animals do Europeans eat
- Why are stoves called ranges
- What are some examples of weekly market
- Do Jehovahs Witnesses drink
- Is PNG cheaper than LPG
- Has the Muslim wazifa ever worked
- Why is Southeast Asian architecture so pointy
- What is metal furniture
- What was Tim Ferriss like in college
- Can I see a quasar